Which terms are acceptable for rating limitations during a ROM assessment?

The choice that includes "within normal limits, mild, moderate, and severe" provides a comprehensive approach to rating limitations during a range of motion (ROM) assessment. This terminology allows the assessor to clearly categorize the findings based on both the degree of limitation and whether the range of motion falls within typical parameters.

Using "within normal limits" gives a baseline to determine if the movement is as expected for a healthy joint or muscle. Following this, the additional descriptors of mild, moderate, and severe allow for nuanced evaluation of any limitations observed. These terms enable the assessor to communicate the severity of restrictions in a precise manner, which is crucial when considering treatment plans or documenting patient progress.

Other terms like "normal, abnormal, restricted" do not provide as much detail regarding the severity of any limitations found during the assessment, while descriptors such as "good, fair, poor" are more often used in strength assessments rather than specifically addressing range of motion. Thus, the selected terminology in the correct answer captures both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of ROM evaluation effectively.